Monday, 12 March 2012

Now at WUWT: Astrologer refutes global warming from chlorofluorocarbons

It is always nice to see a real scientist from one of the hard sciences take on the pseudoscientific superstition of "global climate warming change".  Therefore, the post 'A view of climate “on the ground” from a reporter who was there at the beginning' on WUWT by distinguished astrologer Theodore White is a must read.  I quote:
...
But I digress – in short, when I wrote pieces on the climate, I refused to write on the theory that chlorofluorocarbons were the sole cause of worldwide warming because that had never been proved. Now, though there was evidence that the use of aerosols were clearly evident in the upper atmosphere; the data did not support that this was the cause of the fear-mongering on ozone holes which was all the rage in the climate community of the late 1980s and 1990s.
...
Follow the money pushing the ideological AGW lie. If one examines climate science funding from 1986 to 1996 and then from 1996 to the present – you may find some amazing numbers.
Incredible amounts – increasing yearly and wasted on every bigger and more expensive computers to run models. Careerists who cannot forecast seasonal weather were making things up (and began to alter weather data on purpose) while spending lavishly on computers pushing the AGW ideology – all at the public’s great expense.
....
Still, by 1989, the AGW science did not make sense to me in light that it would violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Which I remind everyone – remains in effect to this very day.

Anyhow, it did not seem to matter to Wirth’s office, Hansen, or the growing careerists at NCAR and NOAA; because whomever was pushing ‘man-made global warming’ on the United States, were also doing it at the international level too.

My view was that it was a conspiracy right from the start to bamboozle the world on the lie of anthropogenic global warming sandbagging much of the mainstream media, the markets and the educational system to not believe their own eyes and ears.
....

With such high-quality contributions, it is no wonder that Whats Up with Watts won the 2012 Weblog Award for Best Science or Technology Weblog.

17 comments:

  1. Endorphin Monkey12 March 2012 at 11:57

    What a relief! The 2nd Law of Thermodialysis is still in effect! I thought the Stalinist post-modernist revisionists had repealed it!! BTW here's the recently discovered 7th Law of Thermodianetics: "If you apply extreme heat to a donut, subjecting it to complete thermal combustion until all that remains is a non-combustible ash residue, you have wasted a perfectly good donut."

    But our tactics on the side of Reason in our crusade against climate fear-monkeying are rubbish! Why are we arguing about climate science data collection and research analysis when it's OBVIOUSLY all a giant hokes!! It's a waste of time because it's all fabrikated FAKE science. It's like arguing about the lead characters in a Ayn Rand novel. They're not real and unfortunately will never take over the world's economy!!

    We have to focus on the HOKES. We don't need our scientists to review their "science". We need accountants to follow their money trail, like tracking a tasty wild animal through the forest, before killing it and turning it into pizza toppings.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh, what a breath of fragrant, crisp, C02-rich Kentish air to hear these wonderful words!

    What is even more wonderful is that distinguished MIT Professor Richard Lindzen-- Sancho Panza to my peerless Peer-- bravely rides his little donkey into the fray, laying waste left and right to the Communist skydragons. See and hear how he opens the field for ozone to win the day!

    Jones:
    If C02 caused warming, how could human production of C02 be catastrophic, when nature produces what, 32 times as much as human beings; 97% of C02 in the world is naturally produced.

    Lindzen:
    Well, yeah, you’re, you’re addressing the issue of how can one regard something essential to life as a pollutant, and, uh, I don’t know the answer to that, it seems absurd but on the other hand you can get many people to sign on to government control of uh, dihydrogen oxide, ah because they don’t know it’s water.

    Jones:
    That’s it. I mean just taking the maths of it, I mean you’re, you’re an eminent scientist; is it true that the proportion of the Earth’s annual production of C02 is about 3% produced by human beings and 97% roughly produced by nature?

    Lindzen:
    Well that’s correct, that’s correct; the (talkover) argument often is presented that the natural part is in balance and our contribution is imbalancing, unbalancing the system and so that’s leading to a rise. Uh, that’s an arguably possible situation but in point of fact there’s limited evidence of that and the merest uh misunderstanding of the 97% could easily overbalance man’s contribution but to be honest that is not an issue that is known at present and I would argue it’s not even the central issue.


    Could it possibly be more simple? No, no, a thousand times no! Dr. Lindzen and his colleagues have been searching desperately for the missing link that might be driven finally once and for all into the coffin that will be lowered into the dark, dank sepulcher emblazoned "Here lies the the Great Global Warming Communist Bureaucratic Wealth Redistributing Eco Scam."

    Rejoice the day when White and Lindzen became as one, joined arms and slew once and for all the spectral dragon of confiscation and confusion!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, there is nothing news here. Everybody who has been following the evilution hoax knows that "sceince" is not objective. Today's "sceince" has an anti-truth agenda! And now it appears we know already since 1989 that "global" "warming" is against the Law! And if it's against the Law, those who propose AGW should be punished! I think it's also not a coincidence that 1989 is the year that communism collapsed. It would seem some communists just cannot admit they were wrong and are trying to restore the communist "world" "order" under the veil of "global" "warming"!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why even argue with the warmists? Everyone knows they are snobs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ...and GLACIAL MELTING is proof of Fudd's First Law of Opposition: "If you push something hard enough it will fall over. "

    ReplyDelete
  6. You quote LINDZEN? Didn't you read what the visionary White WROTE???? The entire scam of CAGW goes against the 2nd law of thermodynamics!! This has been pointed out for YEARS by clear thinking Patriots. I have even read papers FULL of mathematical symbols proving this beyond a doubt. The papers said so in the conclusion. But does LINDZEN acknowledge this "settled science"? POSH. He says with a few telltale "uhs" to show his slavish subjugation to the entrenched Bildenburg elites, I repeat he SAYS "Uh, that’s an arguably possible situation" and then he talks about balance. THE LSM ALWAYS talks about balance when they want to confuse the issue so that the obvious truth will continue to be hidden. Lindzen and his lapdog Spencer, who has the gall to tell people not to even MENTION the 2nd law of thermodynamics (2ndlotd for short) both act embarrassed when confronted with this issue.
    And if you need more proof that they are probably moles set to undermine our great movement to free americans and those other forms of marginal humanity that live in the rest of the world from....sorry I got lost there, but you know what I mean. BOTH have apologized for mistakes. And we KNOW science is never wrong, because capitalism is perfect, and science MUST prove it so they must both be set up to falsely admit to CAGW sometime in the future.
    We must expose them now so that does not happen. Another proof. Have either Lindzen or Spencer EVER even mentioned the daily occurrence of our poisoning by chemtrails and their effects on the climate.? Well have they? Why aren't any of you answering? Well?

    My point being we must put our faith and effort behind White and those like him who will NEVER admit they are wrong, no matter what the brainwashed, sniveling cowardly (but not greedy, that is a good thing) "scientists" say.

    ReplyDelete
  7. What is amazing is that some of the comments above are that dumb and the total lack of denial about what Theodore White wrote - which is true. White spoke the truth on facts about the 2nd law of thermodynamics. This is a guy who forecasts and is accurate. I believe White more than the AGW babies who are the 'deniers' to the truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, let White speak for himself!

      Astrological Outlook
      March 2012

      Forecast by Theodore White, mundane Astrolog.S

      The next six months, from March to August 2012 feature the world entering the second phase of the Cardinal Crisis transits. Much of 2012 by mid-May reveals inclinations that are mainly unfavorable.

      There are distortions and confusion over the right direction in society with deterioration of the broader economic and social climates worldwide during a time of major generational transition.

      The Jupiter-Saturn opposition that defines the second decade of the 21st century depicts individuals, groups, organizations and populations in transition, as one generational establishment leaves while another enters.

      General elections, popular hue-and-cries, economic crisis along with geopolitical changes and social stresses will combine into a fiery mix of discontent, confusion and unfavorable reactions during 2012.

      The months of May, June and July 2012 are hectic months worldwide. Positive activity in March and April will help to lighten the load through the months of May, June and July.

      Setting a balanced tone early helps others to clear away the static and barriers by focusing early on objectives and practical goals.

      Last year, I forecast that an earlier than normal spring will be on tap in 2012. Expect springlike temperatures in northern hemisphere with signs of what will be an early and warmer than average year ahead.


      Plain as the nose on your face, I call it. Springlike temperatures in March; White is a true savant!

      Delete
  8. The King of Puns21 March 2012 at 02:08

    Looks like this singer wants the warmists all singing from the same hymn sheet.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. The All Blacks vs Wallabies must successfully target dynamic All Blacks second rowers Brodie Retallick and
    Sam Whitelock when they attempt to turn their Bledisloe Cup fortunes around, says Australian backrower
    Rory Arnold.The formidable duo of Retallick and Whitelock has been one of the great strengths of the world
    champion All Blacks’ forward ­machine in recent All Blacks vs Wallabies Live years and both are used to winning against the Wallabies.

    All Blacks vs Wallabies Stream
    Watch All Blacks vs Wallabies
    Wallabies vs All Blacks

    ReplyDelete
  11. Whitelock has tasted defeat just three times in 20 games Tests against Australia and Retallick once in 15.
    Rising Wallabies lock Rory ­Arnold said getting an edge over the Wallabies vs All Blacks duo was key for his team.“They’ve been world-class
    locks now for a number of years, so if we want to dominate up front we know we’ve got to go at those blokes,” said Arnold.
    “We’re going to have to be at our best, the Wallabies vs All Blacks Live second-rowers, to take those blokes on.”
    While Whitelock and Retallick have been a constant force for New Zealand,
    Australia have chopped and changed their second-row combinations since the 2015 World Cup final against the All Blacks.

    Wallabies vs All Blacks Live Stream
    Watch Wallabies vs All Blacks Live
    Wallabies vs All Blacks Live Online

    ReplyDelete
  12. The tournament begins with the US Open Tennis 2017 Qualifying Tournament, from Tuesday, August 22, through to Friday, August 25.
    The real thing kicks off the following Monday, August 28, which for Australian audiences will be the early hours of Tuesday, August 29 (AEST).
    In terms of the pointy end of proceedings, the women’s final is set to start at 4pm, US Open Tennis 2017 Live Saturday September 9 (EST), which for Aussies means 6am, Sunday September 7 (AEST).
    As for the men’s final, it will begin at 4pm (EST) the following day, so means another 6am start in Australia, this time on Monday, September 8 (AEST).

    US Open Tennis 2017 Live Stream
    US Open Tennis 2017 Live Online
    US Open Tennis 2017 Live Free

    ReplyDelete
  13. Die US Open sind das wichtigste US Open Tennis 2017 in den USA und eines von vier Grand-Slam-Turnieren weltweit.
    Nach den Australian Open (Hartplatz), den French Open (Sand), Wimbledon (Rasen) ist es das letzte Major des Jahres (Hartplatz).
    Die US-Open finden jährlich seit 1881 statt. Lediglich Wimbledon und der Rogers Cup können auf eine ähnliche Historie zurückblicken.
    Die US Open sind eines von drei Grand-Slam-Turnieren, die im frei US Open Tennis 2017 empfangbaren TV exklusiv auf Eurosport zu sehen sind.
    Zusätzlich zum Hauptprogramm und Eurosport 2 bietet der Sportchannel den Eurosport Player an mit bis zu zehn verschiedenen Livesignalen von den Plätzen.
    Der Player ist jedoch monatlich kostenpflichtig.

    US Open 2017 Finals
    US Open 2017 Finals Live
    US Open 2017 Final Live

    ReplyDelete
  14. Kelley sees Canelo vs Golovkin as having to fight a very smart fight, use his hand speed, and make him miss with his shots for him to win.
    Canelo must counter punch Golovkin at every turn defeat the bigger, stronger fighter from Kazakhstan.
    Lemieux has an even better left hook that Canelo, and Golovkin completely took that punch away from Lemieux by jabbing him from the outside.
    Lemieux never had the opportunity to land his left hooks, Canelo vs Golovkin Live because Golovkin stayed on the outside and jabbed him for the entire fight.

    Canelo vs Golovkin Live Stream
    Golovkin vs Canelo
    Golovkin vs Canelo Live

    ReplyDelete
  15. Kelley sees Canelo as having to fight a very Golovkin vs Canelo smart fight, use his hand speed, and make him miss with his shots for him to win.
    Canelo must counter punch Golovkin at every turn defeat the bigger, stronger fighter from Kazakhstan.
    Lemieux has an even better left hook that Golovkin vs Canelo Live completely took that punch away from Lemieux by jabbing him from the outside.
    Lemieux never had the opportunity to land his left hooks, because Golovkin stayed on the outside and jabbed him for the entire fight.

    Golovkin vs Canelo Live Stream
    Canelo vs Golovkin
    Canelo vs Golovkin Live

    ReplyDelete

Welcome to comment on my blog, dear reader.